Court of Appeals of Oregon· 8/22/2018

State v. Nguyen

Citations

429 P.3d 410
293 Or. App. 492

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that evidence leading to inferences that the defendant committed a certain crime, on its own, can- not overcome the prejudicial effect of improper misconduct evidence
identifying “the importance of the erroneously admitted evidence to a party’s theory of the case” as being relevant to the harmlessness analysis
“If there is little likelihood that the error affected the verdict, we will not reverse on the basis of that error.”
“[D]efendant has the burden to demonstrate that the error affected a substantial right.”
“Defendant has the burden to demonstrate that the error affected a substantial right.”
“[D]efendant has the burden to demonstrate that the error affected a substantial right.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Armstrong, Shorr, Tookey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.