Supreme Court· 6/13/1994
Livadas v. Bradshaw
Citations
- 512 U.S. 107
- 114 S. Ct. 2068
- 129 L. Ed. 2d 93
- 1994 U.S. LEXIS 4444
Judges: Souter
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
590 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Garcetti v. CeballosSupreme Court· 2006-05-30· cited 2,871×
- Sprewell v. Golden State WarriorsNinth Circuit· 2001-09-14· cited 2,313×
- Blessing v. FreestoneSupreme Court· 1997-04-21· cited 1,415×
- Soremekun v. Thrifty Payless, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2007-11-27· cited 937×
- Kobold v. Good Samaritan Regional Medical CenterNinth Circuit· 2016-08-09· cited 925×
- Wilds v. United Parcel Service, Inc.S.D. New York· 2003-05-05· cited 765×
- Wright v. Universal Maritime Service Corp.Supreme Court· 1999-01-25· cited 487×
- City of Rancho Palos Verdes v. AbramsSupreme Court· 2005-03-22· cited 452×
- 14 Penn Plaza LLC v. PyettSupreme Court· 2009-04-01· cited 434×
- Self v. United Parcel Service, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court· 1998-11-23· cited 394×
- New Jersey Carpenters & the Trustees Thereof Ex Rel. Chatten v. Tishman Construction Corp.Third Circuit· 2014-07-28· cited 285×
- James R. Penny v. United Parcel ServiceSixth Circuit· 1997-10-22· cited 276×
- Burnside v. Kiewit Pacific Corp.Ninth Circuit· 2007-06-19· cited 276×
- Save Our Valley v. Sound TransitNinth Circuit· 2003-07-10· cited 250×
- William N. Ledford v. Michael J. Sullivan, Gordon A. Abrahamson, Patrick KnowlesSeventh Circuit· 1997-01-27· cited 244×
- Biw Deceived v. Local S6, Industrial Union of Marine and Shipbuilding Workers of America, Iamaw District Lodge 4First Circuit· 1997-12-30· cited 235×
- James I. Wynn, Jr. v. Ac Rochester, General Motors Corporation, Charles Volo, Personally and in His Capacity as Personnel ManagerSecond Circuit· 2001-11-19· cited 231×
- Balcorta v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.Ninth Circuit· 2000-04-06· cited 231×
- Kelli Lyn Metz, and v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., and Cross-AppelleeTenth Circuit· 1994-11-08· cited 215×
- Martin Marietta Corporation, Aero & Naval Systems v. Maryland Commission on Human RelationsFourth Circuit· 1994-10-27· cited 196×
Cites
42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court· 1984-09-18· cited 9,230×
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1987-06-09· cited 6,547×
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court· 1960-06-20· cited 5,791×
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court· 1961-02-20· cited 4,784×
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1970-04-20· cited 3,777×
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court· 1974-02-19· cited 3,057×
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court· 1959-04-20· cited 2,980×
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court· 1957-06-03· cited 2,816×
- Davis v. SchererSupreme Court· 1984-08-16· cited 2,605×
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court· 1991-05-13· cited 2,511×
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court· 1985-04-16· cited 2,375×
- Maine v. ThiboutotSupreme Court· 1980-06-25· cited 1,890×
- Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court· 1988-06-06· cited 1,828×
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court· 1981-04-20· cited 1,660×
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court· 1985-06-03· cited 1,645×
- Middlesex County Sewerage Authority v. National Sea Clammers Assn.Supreme Court· 1981-06-25· cited 1,562×
- Local 174, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers v. Lucas Flour Co.Supreme Court· 1962-03-05· cited 1,331×
- Fort Halifax Packing Co. v. CoyneSupreme Court· 1987-06-01· cited 1,315×
- Republic Steel Corp. v. MaddoxSupreme Court· 1965-01-25· cited 1,309×
- Perry v. ThomasSupreme Court· 1987-06-15· cited 1,187×
Other cases named Livadas v. Bradshaw
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.