Vlahos v. R&I Construction of Bloomington, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the statutory warranty at issue in Vlahos operates in much the same way as an express warranty of future performance
• holding that claim accrues upon discovery
• noting that district court’s reliance on unpublished opinion of this court “was misplaced, both as a matter of law and as a matter of practice,” and “stress[ing] that unpublished opinions of the court of appeals are not 12 precedential”
• admonishing courts not to rely on unpublished decisions as precedent; to do so is erroneous as a “matter of law and as a matter of practice”
• discussing distinction between discovery of injury and discovery of the breach
• stating that unpublished opinions are not precedential

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).