Skip to main content

State v. Smith

Citations

  • 899 N.W.2d 120
  • 2017 WL 3045517
  • 2017 Minn. LEXIS 422

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the absurdity canon applies in only \exceedingly rare\ cases
  • noting the absurdity canon applies only in the \ 'exceedingly rare case' \ (quoting Schatz v. Interfaith Care Ctr. , 811 N.W.2d 643 , 651 (Minn. 2012) )

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chutich, Gildea, Lillehaug, McKeig, Stras

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.