State v. Caldwell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• hearsay prohibition does not apply if the declarant testifies and is available for cross-examination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Schumpert
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1993-08-23· cited 136×
• State v. Price
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-04-17· cited 63×
• State v. Adams
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1987-01-19· cited 47×
• State v. Robinson
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-09-23· cited 40×
• Clark v. Ross
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1985-03-06· cited 37×
• State v. Myers
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1990-03-19· cited 37×
• State v. Martinez
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1987-11-30· cited 32×
• Simpkins v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-02-04· cited 26×
• State v. Gulledge
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-06-23· cited 25×
• Brown v. LA FRANCE IND., a DIV. OF RIEGEL TEX.
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1985-07-15· cited 24×
• State v. Hill
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1986-01-13· cited 22×
• State v. Garner
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-04-08· cited 21×
• State v. Tillman
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1991-05-28· cited 14×
• State v. Martin
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2011-02-03· cited 13×
• Shields Ex Rel. Estate of Shields v. South Carolina Department of Highways & Public Transportation
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1991-01-07· cited 8×
• State v. Bellamy
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1988-11-14· cited 2×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Newton
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1980-02-12· cited 24×
• State v. Cunningham
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1980-07-23· cited 8×
• State v. Huggins
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1980-07-30· cited 7×