State v. Caldwell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that because the attorney did not offer to withdraw, the trial court was correct in ruling that his testifying would be improper
• “As a matter of evidence law, the general rule is that a defense attorney is competent to testify on behalf of his client.”
• “When defense counsel has reason to believe that he will be called as a witness, the burden is upon him to propose the solution of his withdrawing from the case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Clark
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1980-07-25· cited 189×
• State v. McCall
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1983-11-09· cited 164×
• State v. Cornell
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1994-08-02· cited 97×
• United States v. John A. Tegzes, Susan Langston
  Eleventh Circuit· 1983-09-19· cited 74×
• State v. Cocio
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1985-11-07· cited 73×
• State v. Corrales
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1983-12-15· cited 49×
• Cottonwood Estates, Inc. v. Paradise Builders, Inc.
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1981-02-04· cited 43×
• State v. Grilz
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1983-06-14· cited 38×
• State v. Edwards
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1979-03-27· cited 27×
• State v. Printz
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1980-03-26· cited 26×
• Caldwell v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2004-05-20· cited 26×
• State v. Berge
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1981-09-14· cited 11×
• State v. Vocatura
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 2007-05-17· cited 7×
• Lambright v. Lewis
  D. Arizona· 1996-07-09· cited 4×
• State v. Martinez
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1982-11-04· cited 4×

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Douglas v. Alabama
  Supreme Court· 1965-04-05· cited 1,939×
• Namet v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 498×
• State v. Dessureault
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1969-04-30· cited 227×
• State v. Bojorquez
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1975-05-05· cited 62×
• State v. Narten
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1965-10-28· cited 60×
• State v. Ferrari
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1975-10-23· cited 60×
• Commonwealth v. Scoleri
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1964-07-01· cited 48×
• State v. Money
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1973-10-05· cited 38×
• State v. Hocker
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1976-10-28· cited 37×
• State v. Thomas
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1973-11-07· cited 37×
• State v. Good
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1969-11-05· cited 34×
• People v. Smith
  California Court of Appeal· 1970-12-29· cited 34×
• State v. Cota
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1967-10-19· cited 21×
• State v. Wilson
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1964-04-08· cited 19×
• State v. Richmond
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1975-10-01· cited 17×
• State v. Salazar
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1976-09-30· cited 16×
• Frank E. Cota v. Frank A. Eyman, Warden, Arizona State Prison
  Ninth Circuit· 1972-01-17· cited 12×
• In Re the Estate of Ching
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1962-10-19· cited 12×
• State v. Bechtelheimer
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1940-04-06· cited 11×
• Kerley Chemical Corp. v. Producers Cotton Oil Co.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1965-10-08· cited 10×