Court of Appeals of Oregon· 9/25/1991
State v. Burke
Citations
- 818 P.2d 511
- 109 Or. App. 7
- 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 1450
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the fact that a retroactive law may have a deleterious effect on an individual does not mean that it is ex post facto punishment
- finding that amendment to Oregon expungement statute which applied to “ ‘convictions and arrests which occurred before, as well as those which occurred after’ ” effective date of act, unambiguously expressed legislative intent to have statute apply retrospectively
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rossman, Edmonds
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. McVickersCalifornia Supreme Court· 1992-12-03· cited 84×
- State v. SchmidtWashington Supreme Court· 2001-05-17· cited 61×
- Meadows v. SchiedlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-08-28· cited 42×
- State v. ComeauSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1997-06-19· cited 23×
- State v. ZelinkaCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-10-05· cited 22×
- Boone v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-12-11· cited 21×
- State v. DufortCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-02-26· cited 16×
- Gress v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-08-28· cited 14×
- State v. JabenSupreme Court of Kansas· 2012-06-01· cited 13×
- People v. LinkMichigan Court of Appeals· 1997-11-25· cited 12×
- State v. HardingCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-10-28· cited 11×
- Byrnes v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-05-10· cited 8×
- State v. WilleCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-01-22· cited 7×
- State v. PerezCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-04-21· cited 7×
- State v. LambCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-12-04· cited 6×
- State v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-04-14· cited 6×
- Williford v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-10-11· cited 6×
- State v. BlankenshipCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-07-06· cited 4×
- State v. SylvaCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-09-22· cited 4×
- State v. SorengCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-09-27· cited 2×
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court· 1981-02-24· cited 2,482×
- Trop v. DullesSupreme Court· 1958-03-31· cited 2,182×
- Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court· 1990-06-21· cited 1,864×
- Calder v. BullSupreme Court· 1798-08-17· cited 1,860×
- Flemming v. NestorSupreme Court· 1960-06-20· cited 1,508×
- United States v. LovettSupreme Court· 1946-06-03· cited 654×
- Lindsey v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1937-05-17· cited 556×
- Brown v. Multnomah County District CourtOregon Supreme Court· 1977-10-12· cited 214×
- Whipple v. HowserOregon Supreme Court· 1981-08-11· cited 139×
- Douglas Charles Dufresne v. Benjamin Baer, Chairman, U.S. Parole CommissionEleventh Circuit· 1984-10-29· cited 72×
- Carvalho v. \Andrea C\Supreme Court· 1989-12-04· cited 63×
- State v. GallantOregon Supreme Court· 1988-11-30· cited 44×
- State v. LanganOregon Supreme Court· 1986-04-22· cited 35×
- State v. T.P.M.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1983-03-29· cited 33×
- Jeffrey Raske v. Bob Martinez, Governor, State of Florida, and Richard Dugger, Secretary, Department of CorrectionsEleventh Circuit· 1989-07-11· cited 21×
- Williams v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-10-11· cited 16×
- Williams v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-06-05· cited 15×
- Howard v. State Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-01-23· cited 13×
- Thornton v. HamlinCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1979-07-30· cited 10×
- Perkey v. Psychiatric Security Review BoardCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1983-10-26· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.