Skip to main content
· 3/11/1992

Williams v. Board of Parole

Citations

  • 828 P.2d 465
  • 112 Or. App. 108
  • 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 504

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the petitioner was entitled to be considered for release under the rules in effect when his offenses were committed
  • holding that applying current substantive law would violate the ex post facto clauses of the Oregon and federal constitutions if doing so leads to an increased term of incarceration
  • rules made pursuant to delegated authority are subject to ex post facto analysis
  • rules made pursuant to delegated authority are subject to ex post facto analysis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Buttler, Rossman, De Muniz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.