Skip to main content

State v. Langan

Citations

  • 718 P.2d 719
  • 301 Or. 1
  • 1986 Ore. LEXIS 1138

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “expungement” is a “misnomer” because an order pursuant to ORS 137.225 “is not designed to ‘rewrite history’ and deny the occurrence of an event but to limit the purposes for which official records may be used to exhume that past event”
  • “The applicant has the burden to prove by a preponderance of the evidence any disputed affirmative fact required by the statute.”
  • use of word “shall” in statute providing for trial court order setting aside conviction indicated that, if statutory criteria were met, trial court was required to enter the requested order
  • one of the “preconditions for a motion to set aside a conviction” is that “the applicant must have ‘fully complied with and performed the sentence of the court’ ”
  • the constitutional right against self-incrimination adheres in any proceeding, judicial or nonjudicial, where “the state seeks to compel testimony that may be used against the witness in a criminal prosecution.”
  • one of the “preconditions for a motion to set aside a conviction” is that “the applicant must have ‘fully complied with and performed the sentence of the court’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Peterson, Lent, Linde, Campbell, Carson, Jones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.