Washington Supreme Court· 5/17/2001
State v. Schmidt
Citations
- 143 Wash. 2d 658
- 23 P.3d 462
- 2001 Wash. LEXIS 374
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “it is the law in effect at the time a criminal offense is actually committed that controls disposition of the case”
- loss of liberty, property, the right to vote, and the right to possess a firearm collectively encompass the punishment the State imposes on a convicted felon
- “[E]x post facto prohibitions apply only to statutes which are ‘criminal’ or ‘punitive.’”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Johnson, Madsen, Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. PillatosWashington Supreme Court· 2007-01-25· cited 173×
- State v. LambWashington Supreme Court· 2012-08-16· cited 112×
- Hale v. Wellpinit School Dist. No. 49Washington Supreme Court· 2009-01-15· cited 108×
- Hale v. Wellpinit School District No. 49Washington Supreme Court· 2009-01-15· cited 102×
- Rivard v. StateWashington Supreme Court· 2010-05-06· cited 41×
- Lummi Indian Nation v. StateWashington Supreme Court· 2010-10-28· cited 34×
- In Re Personal Restraint of DyerWashington Supreme Court· 2008-08-07· cited 33×
- In re the Personal Restraint of DyerWashington Supreme Court· 2008-08-07· cited 33×
- State v. AcevedoCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2010-12-09· cited 33×
- State v. NordlundCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-08-30· cited 26×
- State v. OtisCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2009-08-11· cited 22×
- State v. McNealCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2008-01-23· cited 19×
- In re the Estate of HavilandWashington Supreme Court· 2013-03-14· cited 15×
- State v. SellCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-04-01· cited 14×
- State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2003-03-31· cited 14×
- State v. FelixCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2005-01-24· cited 12×
- State v. SweeneyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2005-01-04· cited 12×
- Nelson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2003-12-29· cited 12×
- In re the Personal Restraint of HartzellCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2001-10-29· cited 11×
- In Re HartzellCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2001-10-29· cited 10×
Cites
42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court· 1981-02-24· cited 2,482×
- Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court· 1963-02-18· cited 2,208×
- Trop v. DullesSupreme Court· 1958-03-31· cited 2,182×
- Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court· 1990-06-21· cited 1,864×
- Flemming v. NestorSupreme Court· 1960-06-20· cited 1,508×
- De Veau v. BraistedSupreme Court· 1960-06-06· cited 494×
- Hawker v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1898-04-18· cited 389×
- State v. WardWashington Supreme Court· 1994-03-17· cited 303×
- State v. KnapstadWashington Supreme Court· 1986-12-04· cited 257×
- Johnson v. MorrisWashington Supreme Court· 1976-12-23· cited 169×
- United States v. MeadeFirst Circuit· 1999-05-12· cited 166×
- In Re the Personal Restraint of WilliamsWashington Supreme Court· 1988-07-15· cited 160×
- Morris v. BlakerWashington Supreme Court· 1992-01-02· cited 130×
- Cases v. United StatesFirst Circuit· 1942-11-27· cited 125×
- In the Matter of Personal Restraint of PowellWashington Supreme Court· 2004-08-01· cited 121×
- State v. BraymanWashington Supreme Court· 1988-03-03· cited 116×
- United States v. Miguel Sanchez-RodriguezNinth Circuit· 1998-11-20· cited 106×
- State v. HenningsWashington Supreme Court· 1996-07-18· cited 101×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.