Court of Appeals of Oregon· 12/4/1991
State v. Lamb
Citations
- 822 P.2d 143
- 110 Or. App. 146
- 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 1857
- 1991 WL 255350
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- ex post facto provisions are not violated in a prosecution for felon in possession of a firearm even if a defendant’s felony was committed before enactment of the statute
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Warren, Riggs, Edmonds
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. PetersNebraska Supreme Court· 2001-03-16· cited 49×
- State v. ZelinkaCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-10-05· cited 22×
- State v. HurdCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-07-03· cited 2×
- State v. SchluterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2002-12-10· cited 1×
- State v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-11-04· cited 1×
- State v. BensonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-08-25
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.