Michigan Court of Appeals· 11/25/1997
People v. Link
Citations
- 570 N.W.2d 297
- 225 Mich. App. 211
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[W]e conclude that the expungement statute is remedial and that it does not create new or destroy existing rights.”
- \[W]e conclude that the expungement statute is remedial and that it does not create new or destroy existing rights.\
- \[W]e conclude that the expungement statute is remedial and that it does not create new or destroy existing rights.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Saad, Neff, Jansen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People v. LuethMichigan Court of Appeals· 2003-02-04· cited 194×
- People v. ConyerMichigan Court of Appeals· 2008-11-25· cited 37×
- People v. CampbellMichigan Court of Appeals· 2010-07-13· cited 33×
- Seaton v. Wayne County ProsecutorMichigan Court of Appeals· 1999-03-12· cited 18×
- Huggett v. Department of Natural ResourcesMichigan Court of Appeals· 1999-01-15· cited 17×
- People v. DroogMichigan Court of Appeals· 2009-01-13· cited 15×
- STATE v. SHADECourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma· 2017-11-16· cited 9×
- PLUMLEY v. STATECourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma· 2017-04-07
- People of Michigan v. Stephen Matthew ButkaMichigan Supreme Court· 2024-07-22
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.