Meadows v. Schiedler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that changes in the governing law that are “more onerous” to an inmate will support habeas corpus relief
• holding that the retroactive application of the 1993 amendments to ORS 144.125(3) results in an ex post facto violation
• holding that the retroactive application of the 1993 amendments to ORS 144.125(3) results in an ex post facto violation
• holding that the parole board was required to consider whether plaintiff's parole should be postponed under the criteria in effect at the time the plaintiff committed his crime
• holding that the parole board was required to consider whether plaintiffs parole should be postponed under the criteria in effect at the time the plaintiff committed his crime
• concluding that an amendment removing the term “severe” from ORS 144.125(3) constituted an ex post facto law, because it enabled the board “to postpone release on a less restrictive showing than the previous version authorized”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).