Skip to main content

State v. Boyd

Citations

  • 218 N.E.3d 998
  • 2023 Ohio 2079

Syllabus

Appellant's statutory and constitutional speedy trial rights were not violated. Appellant filed numerous motions, including several requests for continuances, and the trial court ruled on his motions to suppress within a reasonable amount of time. The trial court did not err in overruling appellant's motion to suppress evidence where exigent circumstances existed for police to lawfully enter appellant's residence to render aid to two missing juveniles. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Lewis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.