State v. Jacks

Citations

• 2025 Ohio 2541

Syllabus

Appellant was not denied her constitutional or statutory right to a speedy trial, and her trial counsel did not provide ineffective assistance by failing to raise those claims in the trial court. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in failing to declare a mistrial after a key defense witness was allowed to testify remotely via Zoom because she was unable to appear in person. Judgment affirmed. (Huffman, J., concurring.)