State v. Adams
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 483
Syllabus
State's appeal. The trial court did not err in dismissing misdemeanor charges against appellee based upon a speedy-trial violation. The appellee's pretrial suppression motion only tolled the speedy-trial clock for the time reasonably necessary to decide the motion. The record contains no conceivable justification for a 513-day delay between a hearing on appellee's motion and the trial court's resolution of it. The fact that appellee's suppression motion may have been untimely did not negate the speedy-trial issue. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Tucker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court· 1972-06-22· cited 12,108×
- State v. PachayOhio Supreme Court· 1980-12-23· cited 301×
- State v. MartinOhio Supreme Court· 1978-12-07· cited 61×
- State v. BoydOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-06-23· cited 8×
- State v. HarrellOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-03-15· cited 5×
- State v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Ohio, Fifth District, Ashland County· 2017-12-18· cited 4×
- State v. McClainOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-09-11· cited 3×
- State v. KendallOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-01-03· cited 3×
- State v. ReppucciOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-04-10· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.