Hawaii Supreme Court· 8/17/1993

State v. Bonnell

Citations

856 P.2d 1265
75 Haw. 124

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a person can have a reasonable expectation of privacy in his or her workplace
holding that “the defendants had an objectively ‘reasonable privacy expectation that [they] would not be videotaped by government agents’ in the employee break room” (quoting United States v. Taketa, 923 F.2d 665, 677 (9th Cir.1991))
holding that \the defendants had an objectively `reasonable privacy expectation that [they] would not be videotaped by government agents' in the employee break room\ (quoting United States v. Taketa, 923 F.2d 665, 677 (9th Cir.1991))
reasoning that consent “means more than the absence of an objection”; rather, “it must be shown that such consent was voluntarily given”
reasoning that consent “means more than the absence of an objection”; rather, “it must be shown that - 57 - ***FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST’S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER*** such consent was voluntarily given”
agreeing with Judge Posner in Torres that video surveillance provokes immediate visceral reaction and raises specter of Orwellian state

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moon, Klein, Levinson, Ramil, Shimabukuro

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.