Skip to main content

State v. Romano

Citations

  • 155 P.3d 1102
  • 114 Haw. 1

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the defendant masseuse's responses to questions by an undercover officer regarding sexual services for an additional fee, when taken in context, was sufficient to sustain a prostitution conviction
  • concluding that the defendant mas seuse’s responses to questions by an undercover officer regarding sexual services for an additional fee, when taken in context, was sufficient to sustain a prostitution conviction
  • \Matters of credibility and the weight of the evidence and the inferences to be drawn are for the fact finder.\
  • “Matters of credibility and the weight of the evidence and the inferences to be drawn are for the fact finder.”
  • \Matters of credibility and the weight of the evidence and the inferences to be drawn are for the fact finder.\
  • “[A] court should not depart from the doctrine of stare decisis without some compelling justification.” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moon, Nakayama, Acoba, Duffy, Levinson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

46 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.