United States v. Jesus Fernando Cuevas-Sanchez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that two-month-long pole camera surveillance of fenced-in backyard constituted a search
• stating that it would not announce a “new rule” where any Fourth Amendment violation was harmless
• finding that extended, wattantless use of pole camera to capture drug-related activities occurring behind a 10-foot fence bordering defendant’s backyard constituted a Fourth Amendment “search”
• finding that law enforcement's use of a video pole camera to surveil the backyard of a home protected by a ten-foot- high privacy fence was a Fourth Amendment search
• deciding to \use [Title I] as a guide for the constitutional standard\
• deciding to \use [Title I] as a guide for the constitutional standard\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).