United States v. David Taketa and Thomas O'Brien

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that public employer may not \avoid the probable cause requirement when it is acquiring evidence for a criminal prosecution.\
• holding that one employee had an expectation of privacy from covert video surveillance by the government in another employee’s office
• holding that a law enforcement agency can not “cloak itself in its public employer robes” when searching for evidence to be used in a criminal prosecution
• holding that Fourth Amendment rights are personal and may not be asserted vicariously
• ruling that public employer may not “avoid the probable cause requirement when it is acquiring evidence for a criminal prosecution.”
• ruling that public employer may not “avoid the probable cause requirement when it is acquiring evidence for a criminal prosecution.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).