State v. Augafa

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a court does not have the authority to direct the legislature to adopt a statute because such “action is not ‘reasonabl[ly] necessary to effectuate [the court’s] judicial power[,]’ ” (citation omitted), and is in violation of the separation of powers doctrine
• stating that \a court strays far from [its] function when it directs legislative bodies to adopt specific laws\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).