United States v. Joaquin Emilio Mesa-Rincon, United States of America v. Peter Scott Stoppe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing other circuits require only a discussion of techniques employed and explanation as to why a range of investigation methods would be ineffective or dangerous
• stating that \video surveillance can be vastly more intrusive\ than audio surveillance
• stating that “video surveillance can be vastly more intrusive” than audio surveillance
• recognizing propriety of applying heightened scrutiny to comparatively more intrusive forms of electronic surveillance
• \We simply look to [Title I] for guidance in implementing the fourth amendment in an area that [Title I] does not specifically cover.\
• because covert video surveillance is extraordinarily intrusive method of searching, there must be higher showing of necessity to justify it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).