Hernandez v. Hillsides, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that highly offensive analysis “essentially involves a ‘policy’ determination as to whether the alleged intrusion is highly offensive under the particular circumstances”
• “First, the defendant must intentionally intrude into a place, conversation, or matter as to which the plaintiff has a reasonable expectation of privacy. Second, the intrusion must occur in a manner highly offensive to a reasonable person.”
• “As to the first element of the common law tort, the defendant must have ‘penetrated some zone of physical or sensory privacy * * * or obtained unwanted access to data’ by electronic or other covert means, in vio- lation of the law or social norms.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).