Michigan Court of Appeals· 9/6/2001

People v. Herndon

Citations

633 N.W.2d 376
246 Mich. App. 371

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by allowing the prosecution to call a witness not previously endorsed as a trial witness when the content of the testimony was not a surprise
stating that motive can be helpful to show the necessary elements of a crime, even if motive is not an essential element itself
stating that motive can be helpful to show the necessary elements of a crime, even if motive is not an essential element itself
stating that motive can be helpful to show the necessary elements of a crime, even if motive is not an essential element itself
holding defendant was not entitled to a resentencing hearing to correct the judgment of sentence because the correction is an administrative task
stating that a motive to kill may provide additional circumstantial evidence of a defendant’s premeditation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kelly, Whitbeck, Collins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

80 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named People v. Herndon

15 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.