Commonwealth v. Curnin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Future challenges should focus on the soundness ... of the particular testing process . . . and, if raised, on the proper implementation of that process in the given case”
• \[I]n a criminal trial we will 'not permit the admission of test results showing a DNA match [a positive result] without telling the jury anything about the likelihood of that match occurring'\
• \we agree that DNA typing is generally acceptable ...\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).