Skip to main content

State v. Joon Kyu Kim

Citations

  • 398 N.W.2d 544
  • 1987 Minn. LEXIS 688

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • clarifying that the Webber critical-impact requirement does not require the State to show that the lack of the suppressed evidence “completely destroys” its case; it is enough that the lack “significantly reduces the likelihood of a successful prosecution”
  • expert may testify tests do not exclude defendant and are consistent with defendant being the source
  • trial court correct in refusing to permit expert to testify that 96.4% of males in twin cities population, but not Kim, could be excluded on basis of blood and electrophoresis testing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wahl, Kelley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

135 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.