Skip to main content

State v. Austin

Citations

  • 87 S.W.3d 447
  • 2002 Tenn. LEXIS 400
  • 2002 WL 31103628

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that “[a] criminal defendant lacks standing to complain of the violation of a third party’s Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination” because the right is “personal and cannot be vicariously asserted”
  • adding that it is within the trial court’s discretion to allow individual voir dire of prospective jurors
  • finding the claim of prosecutorial misconduct during closing argument “procedurally defaulted” because the defendant failed to make a contemporaneous objection to the prosecutor’s statements during closing argument
  • “Generally, evidence of threats against witnesses attributed to the accused is probative as being either (1) conduct inconsistent with the accused’s claim of innocence or (2
  • “Generally, evidence of threats against witnesses attributed to the accused is probative as being either (1) conduct inconsistent with the accused’s claim of innocence or (2) conduct consistent with the theory that the making of such threats evinces a consciousness of guilt.”
  • while trial court erred in excluding from evidence vice squad report which may have identified other persons with motive to kill the victim, the “essence” of the report was put before the jury during cross-examination of a witness, so the error was harmless

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Justice Janice M. Holder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

169 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

114 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Austin

219 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.