Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Court of Appeals of Oregon· 12/1/2021

State v. Austin

Citations

  • 316 Or. App. 56
  • 501 P.3d 1136

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “it is not obvious or beyond dispute that the federal constitutional right to be convicted only by unanimous jury verdict is the type of ‘relevant circumstance’ that a defendant must know for his waiver of the right to a jury trial to be knowing and intelligent”
  • holding that “it is not obvious or beyond dispute that the federal constitutional right to be convicted only by unani- mous jury verdict is the type of ‘relevant circumstance’ that a defendant must know for his waiver of the right to a jury trial to be knowing and intelligent”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Aoyagi

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.