Tennessee Supreme Court· 11/7/2008

State v. Banks

Citations

271 S.W.3d 90
2008 Tenn. LEXIS 963
2008 WL 4823068

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that the trial court’s “curative instruction adequately remedied the potential prejudice caused by the prosecutor’s erroneous argument” such that plain error did not occur
concluding that article I, section 9 of the Tennessee Constitution does not require a different result than Crawford
concluding that a shooting victim’s statements about the shooting made several hours later qualified as an excited utterance
holding that statement made approximately six hours after declarant was shot was admissible as an excited utterance
concluding that there was sufficient evidence of premeditation based in part on the defendant’s failure to provide aid or assistance to his victim after he shot him
holding that one instance in which abuse of discretion may be found is where the trial court “based its decision on a clearly erroneous assessment of the evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Koch, Holder, Barker, Clark, Wade

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

610 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

160 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.