Court of Appeals of Washington· 9/17/1990

State v. Austin

Citations

796 P.2d 746
59 Wash. App. 186
1990 Wash. App. LEXIS 363

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

encouraging the committee on jury instructions to adopt language reflecting a change in a governing statute
concluding former CrR 3.3(f)(2) (1986)— which is the same as the current CrR 3.3(d)(3) at issue here—does not apply when the trial setting procedure occurs fewer than 10 days before the expiration of the time-for-trial period
encouraging the committee on jury instructions to adopt language reflecting a chan~e in a governing statute
defendant did not make timely objection to trial date being reset beyond speedy trial period
defendant did not make timely objection to trial date being reset beyond speedy trial period
criminal defendant waived right to speedy trial by not raising the issue until after it was too late to commence the trial within the speedy trial period

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.