Skip to main content
· 2/13/2014

Candace Watson v. City of Jackson

Citations

  • 448 S.W.3d 919
  • 2014 WL 575915
  • 2014 Tenn. App. LEXIS 72

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • considering the substantive merit of recusal issue in Rule 10B appeal despite procedural deficiencies in both the motion filed in the trial court and the petition for recusal appeal filed in Court of Appeals
  • describing Tenn. Code Ann. § 17-2-101 as generally applicable to judges
  • “Adverse rulings and ‘the mere fact that a witness takes offense at the court’s assessment of the witness,’ do not provide grounds for recusal . . . in light of the ‘adversarial nature of litigation.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge J. Steven Stafford

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.