Skip to main content

State v. Austin

Citations

  • 769 P.2d 1098
  • 70 Haw. 300
  • 1989 Haw. LEXIS 16

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that evidence of the defendant’s prior drug dealing was admissible under HRE Rule 404(b) where the defendant denied any involvement in the cocaine trafficking at issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lum, C.J., and Nakamura, Padgett, Hayashi and Wakatsuki

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.