Court of Appeals of Oregon· 10/6/2004

State v. Atwood

Citations

98 P.3d 751
195 Or. App. 490
2004 Ore. App. LEXIS 1262

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that the defendant did not violate ORS 166.025(1)(a) where he “gestured angrily” and he stated that he would “‘take off [a school secretary’s] head and shit down her throat’”
explaining that conduct that initially appears to be immediately likely to produce physical force may be revealed to be innocuous, or vice versa, when considered along with a person’s statements
noting that noth- ing in our disorderly conduct case law “precludes the trier of fact from considering evidence of a defendant’s statements as part of the circumstantial context of particular conduct”
holding that the statute requires such proof

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Haselton, Deits, Wollheim

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.