State v. Davis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[A] court is allowed to consider the surround- ing circumstances in assessing the act. Those circumstances can include accompanying speech.”
• “the mental state component of disorderly conduct requires an intent to cause, or a reckless disregard of the risk of caus- ing, public inconvenience, annoyance or alarm” (emphasis in original)
• conclud- ing that the trial court did not err in denying the defendant’s MJOA
• conclud- ing that the trial court did not err in denying the defendant’s MJOA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Leers
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-01-05· cited 3×
• State v. Roberts
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-06-17· cited 2×
• State v. Allen
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-05-12· cited 2×
• State v. Hashoosh
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-09-10· cited 1×
• Clemens v. Miller
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2026-06-17· cited 1×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Cunningham
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1994-09-09· cited 277×
• State v. King
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1989-01-31· cited 170×
• State v. Cantwell
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1984-02-08· cited 35×
• State v. Atwood
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-10-06· cited 18×
• State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. Krieger
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-10-03· cited 15×
• State v. Miller
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-03-04· cited 9×
• State v. Pucket
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-05-16· cited 7×
• State v. Richardson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-03-23· cited 7×
• State v. Love
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-06-03· cited 6×
• State v. Hosley
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-12-14· cited 6×