State v. Pucket

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “charges for internal labor shall be allowed as mitigation costs without any reduction”
• holding that “any ‘benefits’ that the government seeks to offset must be shown to a reasonable certainty, or they must be denied as too speculative to meet the standards set forth by the Federal Circuit[.]”
• holding that “any ‘benefits’ that the government seeks to offset must be shown to a reasonable certainty, or they must be denied as too speculative to meet the standards set forth by the Federal Circuit[.]”
• holding that “any ‘benefits’ that the government seeks to offset must be shown to a reasonable certainty, or they must be denied as too speculative to meet the standards set forth by the Federal Circuit[.]”
• holding that “any ‘benefits’ that the government seeks to offset must be shown to a reasonable certainty, or they must be denied as too speculative to meet the standards set forth by the Federal Circuit[.]”
• noting that to eliminate or reduce a plaintiffs mitigation related damages, defendant must show that the plaintiffs mitigation efforts were unreasonable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).