Court of Appeals of Oregon· 3/4/2009
State v. Miller
Citations
- 203 P.3d 319
- 226 Or. App. 314
- 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 122
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- kicking a sign was not “incidental physical conduct” because it was not incidental to speech—the defendant did not “kick the sign as a common method of gaining someone’s attention” (internal quotation marks omitted)
- kicking a sign was not “incidental physical conduct” because it was not incidental to speech—the defendant did not “kick the sign as a common method of gaining someone’s attention” (internal quotation marks omitted)
- kicking a sign was not “incidental physical conduct” because it was not incidental to speech—the defen- dant did not “kick the sign as a common method of gaining someone’s attention” (internal quotation marks omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Landau, Ortega, Carson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. AlbarelliSupreme Court of Vermont· 2011-02-18· cited 17×
- State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-03-18· cited 10×
- State v. William SchenkSupreme Court of Vermont· 2018-05-04· cited 7×
- State v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-03-23· cited 7×
- State v. HosleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-12-14· cited 6×
- State v. KreftCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-04-01· cited 5×
- State v. PittsCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-08-09· cited 1×
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.