Skip to main content
· 10/3/2001

State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. Krieger

Citations

  • 33 P.3d 351
  • 177 Or. App. 156
  • 2001 Ore. App. LEXIS 1527

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Under Cantwell, the question whether youth engaged in ‘threaten- ing behavior’ prohibited by the disorderly conduct statute must be answered by looking at his physical actions, not his speech.”
  • “We find nothing in youth’s physi- cal acts, separate from his speech, that constitutes the sort of physical force or physical conduct likely to produce such force that the disorderly conduct statute prohibits.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edmonds, Armstrong, Kistler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.