City of Eugene v. Lee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting Marker’s analysis in context of constitutional challenge to City of Eugene’s disorderly conduct ordinance
• reversing conviction under Eugene city ordinance that is identical to ORS 166.025(l)(a
• reversing conviction under city ordinance identical to ORS 166.025(l)(a), concluding that the defendant’s conduct of loudly preaching and haranguing passersby while pounding on his Bible did not constitute acts of physical aggression
• reversing conviction under city ordinance that was identical to ORS 166.025(l)(a
• reversing conviction under city ordinance that was identical to ORS 166.025(1)(a
• determining category into which enactment falls requires construing it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).