Court of Appeals of Oregon· 6/17/2009
State v. Ruff
Citations
- 211 P.3d 277
- 229 Or. App. 98
- 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 816
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- a sword did not qualify as a dagger but qualified as an “other similar instrument” for the purpose of an officer’s reasonable suspicion that the defendant carried a concealed weapon
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Edmonds, Wollheim, Sercombe
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court· 1993-07-01· cited 660×
- State v. HallOregon Supreme Court· 2005-07-15· cited 336×
- State v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court· 1991-05-30· cited 257×
- State v. CantwellCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1984-02-08· cited 35×
- State v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1977-01-10· cited 23×
- State v. AtwoodCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-10-06· cited 18×
- City of Eugene v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-10-31· cited 14×
- State v. McJunkinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-12-27· cited 11×
- State v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-08-13· cited 10×
- State v. CourtierCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-04-12· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.