Court of Appeals of Oregon· 12/28/2023

State v. Anderson

Citations

329 Or. App. 754
542 P.3d 449

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that “rela- tively minimal movement” is sufficient
defendant’s acts and words “could lead a rational jury to conclude, beyond a reasonable doubt, that he was threatening J and that his threat was not empty, but was instead a threat of serious and imminent harm”
defendant’s acts and words “could lead a rational jury to conclude, beyond a reasonable doubt, that he was threatening J and that his threat was not empty, but was instead a threat of serious and imminent harm”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.