State v. Garcias

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• even if joint venture agreement existed between parties, “the agreement would still be void and unenforceable as a matter of law under Rule 1.5(f)”
• a “supreme court rule is applied -9- 2016 IL App (2d) 151148 retroactively, even though it was different from its predecessor rule”
• a “supreme court rule is applied -9- 2016 IL App (2d) 151148 retroactively, even though it was different from its predecessor rule”
• a “supreme court rule is applied retroactively, even though it was different from its predecessor rule”
• a “supreme court rule is applied retroactively, even though it was different from its predecessor rule” (citing Dowd & Dowd, Ltd. v. Gleason, 181 Ill. 2d 460, 481 (1998))
• where the court looked to Storment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).