Court of Appeals of Oregon· 9/30/2015

State v. Worth

Citations

274 Or. App. 1
360 P.3d 536
2015 Ore. App. LEXIS 1177

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

observing that “a sentence that comports with the ‘shift-to-I’ rule, but violates the ‘200%’ rule, must be adjusted to comply with the latter”
“[A] sentence that comports with the ‘shift-to-I’ rule, but violates the ‘200%’ rule, must be adjusted to comply with the latter.”
explaining the 200-percent rule for nondepar- ture sentences

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edmonds, Haselton, Nakamoto

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.