Oregon Supreme Court· 1/22/1980
State v. Garcia
Citations
- 605 P.2d 671
- 288 Or. 413
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that commission had considered treating \casual\ receivers the same as other types of thieves and \professional\ receivers more harshly
- relying on same legislative history in interpreting term “substantially’ in adopted version of the law
- defendant who committed three separately defined acts of sodomy may be sentenced for only one offense but sentence may take cognizance of multiple acts
- defendant who committed three separately defined acts of sodomy may be sentenced for only one offense but sentence may take cognizance of multiple acts
- multiple sentences for rape and sodomy permissible even though they were arguably part of a single criminal episode with a single criminal objective
- separate punishments appropriate if “the defendant, after one act, starts anew after a time of reflection”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Howell, Lent, Peterson, Tongue
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
89 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court· 2009-04-30· cited 1,741×
- State v. YarboughSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1985-10-07· cited 697×
- State v. AnthonyTennessee Supreme Court· 1991-09-23· cited 280×
- State v. SalamonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-07-01· cited 243×
- State v. LerchOregon Supreme Court· 1984-02-08· cited 87×
- State v. MurrayOregon Supreme Court· 2006-05-25· cited 65×
- Mobley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1982-01-28· cited 63×
- State v. MillerWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1985-11-08· cited 58×
- State v. LinthwaiteOregon Supreme Court· 1983-06-21· cited 53×
- State v. WolleatOregon Supreme Court· 2005-05-05· cited 48×
- State v. WoodleyOregon Supreme Court· 1988-08-30· cited 48×
- People v. WesleyMichigan Supreme Court· 1985-02-01· cited 42×
- Stelts v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court· 1985-06-18· cited 40×
- State v. KnowlesOregon Supreme Court· 1980-10-21· cited 37×
- State v. ReamsOregon Supreme Court· 1981-11-24· cited 35×
- Saavedra v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-04-04· cited 34×
- State v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1980-03-10· cited 27×
- People v. HammonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1987-05-08· cited 27×
- State v. PierceMontana Supreme Court· 1982-07-07· cited 26×
- State of Tennessee v. Jerome Maurice TeatsTennessee Supreme Court· 2015-07-14· cited 24×
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
- Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1955-05-09· cited 1,300×
- Broadcast Music, Inc. v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court· 1979-04-17· cited 694×
- Gray v. StateTennessee Supreme Court· 1976-06-01· cited 309×
- People v. ChessmanCalifornia Supreme Court· 1951-12-18· cited 252×
- State v. CloutierOregon Supreme Court· 1979-06-12· cited 135×
- State v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1977-12-19· cited 121×
- State v. WelchOregon Supreme Court· 1973-02-01· cited 84×
- People v. CoxIllinois Supreme Court· 1972-11-30· cited 84×
- Pilson v. BordenkircherSupreme Court· 1979-10-09· cited 50×
- State v. HillArizona Supreme Court· 1969-02-13· cited 41×
- Lillard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1975-04-30· cited 39×
- State v. SteeleCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1978-04-17· cited 37×
- State v. BilesOregon Supreme Court· 1979-07-12· cited 28×
- State v. CloutierCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1978-03-13· cited 21×
- People v. MeintsAppellate Court of Illinois· 1976-08-26· cited 21×
- Wootten v. DillardOregon Supreme Court· 1979-04-03· cited 17×
- State v. HarrisOregon Supreme Court· 1979-09-11· cited 16×
- State v. CarrollSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1975-03-04· cited 13×
- People v. TateAppellate Court of Illinois· 1976-04-13· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.