Court of Appeals of Arizona· 12/21/2000

State v. Anderson

Citations

16 P.3d 214
199 Ariz. 187
337 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 12
2000 Ariz. App. LEXIS 190

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

reasoning that the jury’s acquittal on some charges “undermined” defendant’s argument of 10 STATE v. KAVU Decision of the Court prejudice
rejecting an argument on fundamental-error review that prejudicial evidence inflamed the jury when the defendant was acquitted of several more serious charges
reasoning jury’s acquittal on some charges “undermined” defendant’s argument of prejudice
“[A] trial court must advise the defendant of . . . the defendant’s right to proceed to trial and require the State to prove the allegation.”
“Where a statute is subject to more than one interpretation, the rule of lenity requires that doubts be resolved in favor of the defendant and against imposing the harsher punishment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Weisberg, Garbarino, Ehrlich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.