Court of Appeals of Arizona· 8/23/2007
State v. Carter
Citations
- 216 Ariz. 286
- 165 P.3d 687
- 511 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 3
- 2007 Ariz. App. LEXIS 163
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that if, on remand, the defendant could prove he was prejudiced by the trial court's failure to engage in a Rule 17.6 colloquy, his sentence must be vacated and the defendant must be resentenced
- providing that when the record contains the documented evidence of the prior convictions that the defendant stipulated, whether the defendant “could establish that he would not have admitted his prior convictions if he had been given a Rule 17.6 colloquy” is irrelevant
- declining to accept evidence \offered for the first time on appeal\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Barker, Hall, Johnsen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2013-12-19· cited 19×
- State v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2012-08-07· cited 12×
- State v. OsbornCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2009-02-24· cited 5×
- State v. BuntingCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2011-01-25
- State v. VarelaCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2018-07-12
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1969-06-02· cited 12,640×
- United States v. Dominguez BenitezSupreme Court· 2004-06-14· cited 2,402×
- State v. HendersonArizona Supreme Court· 2005-07-08· cited 1,009×
- GM Development Corp. v. Community American Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1990-07-26· cited 99×
- State v. SchackartArizona Supreme Court· 1997-10-30· cited 94×
- State v. CrowderArizona Supreme Court· 1987-12-04· cited 70×
- State v. MoralesArizona Supreme Court· 2007-05-08· cited 56×
- State v. HamiltonArizona Supreme Court· 1984-09-25· cited 46×
- State v. AlvaradoArizona Supreme Court· 1979-02-02· cited 34×
- State v. Medrano-BarrazaCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1997-12-08· cited 31×
- Schaefer v. MurpheyArizona Supreme Court· 1982-01-15· cited 28×
- State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2000-12-21· cited 26×
- Foster v. IrwinArizona Supreme Court· 2000-02-29· cited 20×
- State v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2001-04-19· cited 15×
- State v. StuartCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1990-11-01· cited 12×
- State v. NietoCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1978-04-25· cited 12×
- Raney v. LindbergCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2003-09-23· cited 11×
- State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1980-02-01· cited 7×
- Benitez v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1971-06-24· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.