State v. Medrano-Barraza

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining non-pleading defendant who admitted prior convictions entitled to appeal sentence, in part because, under contrary interpretation of § 13-4033(B
• “We presume the framers of the statute did not intend an absurd result and our construction must avoid such a consequence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).