State v. George

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a defendant whose conduct fit “squarely within the statute’s ambit” could not challenge the statute as vague

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• State v. Francisco
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2020-05-05· cited 1×

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Grayned v. City of Rockford
  Supreme Court· 1972-06-26· cited 4,166×
• State v. Henderson
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2005-07-08· cited 1,009×
• State v. Stroud
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2005-01-07· cited 99×
• Goodman v. Samaritan Health System
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1999-03-16· cited 44×
• R.L. Augustine Construction Co. v. Peoria Unified School District No. 11
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1997-05-21· cited 32×
• State v. Kaiser
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2003-04-01· cited 29×
• State v. Thompson
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1983-10-13· cited 28×
• State v. Zaragoza
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2009-06-03· cited 26×
• State v. Anderson
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2000-12-21· cited 26×
• State v. Lara
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1995-09-19· cited 24×
• State v. Brown
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2004-02-17· cited 24×
• Morgan v. Municipality of Anchorage
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1982-04-22· cited 23×
• State v. Lefevre
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1998-07-21· cited 21×
• State v. Silva
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2009-09-22· cited 15×
• State v. Poshka
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2005-04-01· cited 12×
• State v. Boyd
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2001-09-25· cited 8×
• People v. Olive
  California Supreme Court· 2001-07-24· cited 3×