State v. Young

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “the defendant must, at the very least, assert on appeal that he would not have admitted the prior felony convictions had a different colloquy taken place.”
• holding that there is no error, let alone fundamental error, when the defendant was advised of his rights and knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived the right to a priors trial
• declaring, in the context of the adequacy of a colloquy regarding prior convictions, that “the defendant must, at the very least, assert on appeal that he would not have admitted the prior felony convictions had a different colloquy taken place.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• State v. Gonzales
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2013-12-19· cited 19×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Boykin v. Alabama
  Supreme Court· 1969-06-02· cited 12,640×
• State v. Henderson
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2005-07-08· cited 1,009×
• State v. Morales
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2007-05-08· cited 56×
• State v. Anderson
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2000-12-21· cited 26×
• State v. Richards
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1990-08-07· cited 22×
• State v. Carter
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2007-08-23· cited 15×
• State of Arizona v. Steven Ray Miller
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2007-04-30· cited 4×