Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 3/31/2000

State v. Phillips

Citations

30 S.W.3d 372
2000 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 284
2000 WL 336960

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the defendant was not in custody for Miranda purposes during his interview with DCS when he voluntarily came to the - 19 - interview and his freedom of movement was not deprived to a degree associated with a formal arrest
noting the substantive effect of the trial court’s decision to grant a motion to suppress is dismissal of the indictment
first, concluding that the defendant was not in custody for purposes of Miranda, and then, proceeding to examine the voluntariness of the non-custodial confession
first, concluding that the defendant was not in custody for purposes of Miranda, and then, proceeding to examine the voluntariness of the non-custodial confession

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge Joe G. Riley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.