Supreme Court of Connecticut· 7/27/1982
State v. Acquin
Citations
- 187 Conn. 647
- 448 A.2d 163
- 1982 Conn. LEXIS 568
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that inquiries about counsel do not constitute interrogation
- finding that inquiries about counsel do not constitute interrogation
- when we test the quantum of [evidence supporting] probable cause, it is not the personal knowledge of the arresting officer but the collective knowledge of the law enforcement organization at the time of the arrest which must be considered
- “when we test the quantum of [evidence supporting] probable cause, it is not the personal knowledge of the arresting officer but the collective knowledge of the law enforcement organization at the time of the arrest which must be considered”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Speziale, Peters, Healey, Armentano, Shea
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
57 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Oregon v. BradshawSupreme Court· 1983-06-23· cited 1,351×
- State v. AshermanSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-07-17· cited 255×
- State v. SharpeSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-04-16· cited 175×
- Mulligan v. RiouxSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-06-28· cited 164×
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-04-24· cited 160×
- State v. StoddardSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-02-02· cited 138×
- State v. WilsonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-04-22· cited 99×
- Timothy Dale Bunch v. Charles Thompson, Warden, (Two Cases)Fourth Circuit· 1991-11-27· cited 95×
- State v. AlvarezSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-08-21· cited 95×
- State v. ShifflettSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-05-20· cited 95×
- State v. RasmussenSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-03-16· cited 95×
- State v. HaffordSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-03-07· cited 89×
- State v. TillmanSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-12-03· cited 86×
- State v. GuertinSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-06-21· cited 80×
- State v. BarrettSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-12-08· cited 79×
- State v. FerrellSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-08-09· cited 75×
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-12-29· cited 70×
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-03-11· cited 65×
- State v. NorthropSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-01-09· cited 62×
- State v. SimmsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-11-25· cited 60×
Cites
56 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 12,871×
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court· 1938-05-31· cited 10,545×
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 9,088×
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 8,442×
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1925-11-26· cited 7,454×
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1981-06-22· cited 6,931×
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court· 1980-06-30· cited 6,313×
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1966-06-20· cited 6,067×
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1949-10-10· cited 6,013×
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court· 1980-05-12· cited 5,571×
- Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1975-06-26· cited 4,589×
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court· 1964-06-15· cited 3,675×
- Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1979-06-05· cited 3,633×
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court· 1977-01-25· cited 2,680×
- Michigan v. MosleySupreme Court· 1975-12-09· cited 2,561×
- Duren v. MissouriSupreme Court· 1979-01-09· cited 2,373×
- North Carolina v. ButlerSupreme Court· 1979-04-24· cited 2,172×
- Culombe v. ConnecticutSupreme Court· 1961-06-19· cited 1,662×
- Beckwith v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1976-04-21· cited 1,005×
Other cases named State v. Acquin
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.